The Volokh Conspiracy
https://reason.com/volokhMostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent | Est. 2002
Entries
-
Excerpts from Tuesday's long opinion by Judge Trevor McFadden (D.D.C.) in Sumrall v. Ali: [1.] Kimmara Sumrall and Ja...
-
Something strange happened in these two cases.
-
"Nor is it evident that the approach taken by Defendants insulated the process from undue 'political influence.' To t...
-
"Professor Abdou provides no authority which stands for the proposition that expressing disapproval of a foreign terr...
-
Last week, the Tennessee Supreme Court denied the parents' application to review the Tennessee Court of Appeals' ruli...
-
Minnesota officials were using the law to block contested claims about when felons were allowed to vote in Minnesota ...
-
8/20/1866: President Andrew Johnson proclaims an "end to insurrection in the United States." The post Today in Suprem...
-
What’s on your mind?
-
Some excerpts from the long opinion in R.J. Reynolds Tobacco v. FDA, written by Judge Don Willett and joined in… The ...
-
An excellent piece today by Jesse Singal in The Dispatch; the whole thing is worth reading, but here are some… The po...
-
An election law question that seems destined for the Supreme Court.
-
From the longish opinion by Judge David Alan Ezra in East Plano Islamic Center v. Texas Funeral Servs. Comm'n, decide...
-
Some excerpts from yesterday's long decision in Planned Parenthood Great Nw. v. Comm'r, decided by Judge David Hamilt...
-
It is edited by Richard Epstein, Mario Rizzo, and Liya Palagashvili. I am one of the contributors.
-
From yesterday's Complaint in Republic of Azerbaijan v. CNN, Inc. (D. Del.): … Azerbaijan … brings this defamation co...
-
From his post last night on Election Law Blog (Hasen is one of the top election law scholars in the… The post Prof. R...
-
Arizona S. Ct.: Concern About "Job Offers" Being "Withdrawn" Because of "Pending Civil Litigation" …
doesn't justify sealing of court records.
-
8/19/1937: Justice Hugo Black takes the oath. The post Today in Supreme Court History: August 19, 1937 appeared fir...
-
What’s on your mind?
-
The lack of a scienter requirement renders the content-based ban unconstitutional.