The Volokh Conspiracy
https://reason.com/volokhMostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent | Est. 2002
Entries
-
I'm delighted to report that Profs. Jacob Mchangama (Vanderbilt) & Jeff Kosseff (Naval Academy, moving this year to M...
-
My seminar picks for 2026 (and every year since 2005)
-
From Remus Enterprises 1, LLC v. Breece, decided Thursday by the D.C. Court of Appeals (Judge Shanker, joined by Judg...
-
5/3/1802: Washington D.C. incorporated as the capital of the United States. Article I, Section 8 empowers Congress to...
-
What’s on your mind?
-
As I saw at a recent conference, the two groups are similar in many ways. But there are a few notable differences.
-
Court Upholds Ban on Military Retirement Home Residents' Wearing Political Clothing in Public Spaces
The Court has in the past upheld restrictions on political activity (such as candidate speeches) on military bases, s...
-
I am certain that this claim is accurate.
-
From Jimenez-Fogarty v. Fogarty, decided Wednesday by Magistrate Gabriel W. Gorenstein (S.D.N.Y.); Lindsay had run fo...
-
5/2/1927: Buck v. Bell decided. The post Today in Supreme Court History: May 2, 1927 appeared first on Reason.com.
-
What’s on your mind?
-
This case will go to the Supreme Court very quickly.
-
The appellate court rightly concludes that Gordon-Darby's lawsuit had multiple legal problems.
-
It limits executive power grabs in this field, as well as others.
-
The administration is wrong to claim that the 60-day time limit in the Act is "stops" due to the ongoing ceasefire.
-
Smart meters, bad metaphors, and the color of state law
-
So holds an Oregon appellate court.
-
An excerpt from Delaware Superior Court Judge Sean Lugg's 42-page opinion yesterday in Newsom v. Fox News Network, LL...
-
A notable roster of center-right thinkers engages with Justice Thomas' recent lecture.
-
The first step in recovery is recognizing that you have a problem.